Oh shit. Wall Street Journal just divided by zero.
posted by BradOFarrell at 2008-07-10 11:39:00 ![]()
Okay that was actually a really good article on it. I'm sure /b/tards will be outraged, but that was the first 4chan news story I've read that seemed like the reporter even has a vague idea of what 4chan actually is.<br /><br /> <br /><br /> <em>"It's like that psychological concept of deinvidualization -- when groups of people become less aware of their own responsibility."</em><br /><br /> <br /><br /> <B>Yes.</B><br /><br /> <br /><br />
posted by BradOFarrell at 2008-07-10 11:48:15 ![]()
How weird is it that on the same day that the 4chan founder outs himself in the WSJ there's <a href="http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1821435,00.html" target="_blank">a Time.com article</a> that makes a big deal about keeping his name anonymous?<br /><br /> <br /><br /> Did he get a PR guy or something?
posted by Gavin at 2008-07-10 12:41:06 ![]()
Also, if you currently google 4chan & "Christopher Poole" you currently get 10 results about half of which are the WSJ article. <br /><br /> <br /><br /> Talk about keeping your name out of something.
posted by Gavin at 2008-07-10 12:44:04 ![]()
I will cry real tears the day when one of my kids asks for a credit card to purchase a domain. <br /><br /> <br /><br /> "sniff.. whimper.. sniff.. here's my GoDaddy login.. make sure you grab the .org and .net while you're at it.. whimper."
posted by rico at 2008-07-10 14:43:23 ![]()
Looks like <em>Time</em> felt left out and updated the last paragraph of their article:<br /><br /> <br /><br /> <em>He's even ready to reveal his real name: it's Christopher Poole, he tells me.</em>
posted by Adam at 2008-07-10 16:31:52 ![]()
D'oh. I didn't finish the damn article!
posted by gavin at 2008-07-10 18:07:24 ![]()
Just wanted to let u know - moot made that up<br /><br /> <br /><br /> Christopher Poole is definitely not his real name ;)
posted by b-tard at 2008-07-11 09:42:45 ![]()

