wow. so that i can continue reading your blog, i'm gonna assume that final comment was sarcasm or irony and not as asinine as it sounds.
posted by epc at 2007-05-21 18:58:42 ![]()
What, they aren't hot?
posted by Rex at 2007-05-21 20:33:46 ![]()
Yeah, epc, have you ever <em>read</em> a Gawker blog?
posted by dirk at 2007-05-22 01:44:33 ![]()
nah, but they're hott. and i guess that was the irony.
posted by epc at 2007-05-22 10:25:56 ![]()
There are so many conflicts of editorial integrity at Jezebel one assumes that must be the point. Railing against women's magazines while spouting a newer/hipper/hotter form of meta flagellation is complete bullshit.
posted by Steve Bryant at 2007-05-22 10:58:41 ![]()

